Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Technical Blog
  3. EMC
  4. What an on-board charger has to be tested for: EMC, temperature rise, insulation and mating durability

What an on-board charger has to be tested for: EMC, temperature rise, insulation and mating durability

Key takeaways

On-board charger testing falls into four lines: EMC (conducted emission and immunity), electrical safety (temperature rise, insulation resistance and dielectric strength), interface durability (mating cycles, salt spray), and environmental protection (IP rating and vibration). EMC problems originate in the switching supply and the layout, so addressing them early is cheaper; connector erosion and temperature rise depend on terminal crimping and plating, and need vehicle-level load conditions to validate.

The on-board charger is the energy entry point of an electric vehicle, and a frequent source of complaints and recalls. Its testing cannot be summed up as "one EMC report" — by failure risk it splits into four lines.

1. EMC: explore it first during development

Inside the OBC is a textbook high-power switching supply, and conducted emission is usually the first limit to be hit: the switching frequency and its harmonics travel out along the power harness and are measured as a disturbance voltage on the LISN. Emission limits for automotive components come from CISPR 25 / GB 18655, immunity from the ISO 11452 series.

Immunity covers two scenarios: conducted disturbance on the vehicle harness (bulk current injection, conducted transients), and radiated fields. At the exploratory stage, validate to the target customer's levels and leave margin in layout and filtering.

2. Electrical safety: temperature rise and insulation

The temperature rise test at rated load maps directly onto complaints such as "the charge port gets hot": measure the temperature distribution at the interface terminals, internal joints and critical devices, and assess heat build-up over long full-load charging. Insulation resistance and dielectric strength validate the clearance design between the high-voltage circuit and the housing; insulation retention after damp heat ageing is a common checkpoint.

3. Interface durability: mating cycles and salt spray

The vehicle-side charging interface is cycled to the mechanical mating count in the interface standard, assessing contact wear and retention force; drift in contact resistance after cycling is the core criterion — continuity does not mean the contact resistance is unchanged. Salt spray addresses corrosion protection of the contact plating, and measuring the change in contact resistance after exposure is more meaningful than judging appearance alone.

4. Environmental protection: IP and vibration

Externally mounted interfaces and charging guns usually require IP67 (dust-tight plus short-term immersion). Vibration and shock at the vehicle mounting position follow ISO 16750-3 or the customer profile, with attention on internal power devices and connector solder joints.

5. How to combine the standards

EMC: CISPR 25 / ISO 11452. Environmental and mechanical: GB/T 28046 and ISO 16750. Interface performance and dimensions: the corresponding interface standard (the national AC and DC interface standards, IEC 62196 and so on), to the version the customer specifies. OEMs often add their own tightened items, which the procurement technical agreement governs.

Turnaround time is arranged according to the actual project. You are welcome to state your target date when submitting samples; we will check it against the current schedule, confirm a feasible plan with you, and update you at each milestone.

Related Q&A

Related questions

Frequently asked questions on the same topic. The first paragraph of each answer is the conclusion.

Which standards are commonly used for automotive EMC testing, and how do I choose?

Four sets dominate: CISPR 25 / GB 18655 (emission limits and immunity test conditions for components—GB 18655 is the Chinese adoption), ISO 11452 (EMC measurement methods for vehicles and large components), ISO 10605 (electrostatic discharge), and UN ECE R10 / GB 30512 (whole-vehicle type approval for EU export).

Selection follows the customer or OEM specification; many OEMs impose stricter in-house standards, which take precedence per the purchasing technical agreement.

What sample condition does EMC testing require?

Samples must be fully functional: powered on, entering the specified operating mode, with the matched harnesses and loads. Vehicle components are set up per the OEM-specified harness length, ground points and load impedance—otherwise results are not comparable.

Bare boards or semi-finished units generally cannot complete emission and immunity items; if staged verification is needed, confirm an alternative test plan and acceptance basis with the engineer first.

Conducted or radiated emission—which should I test first?

In practice conducted emission needs no anechoic chamber and has a lower entry barrier, so it usually goes first. But radiated emission failures often involve layout and structure, with a larger blast radius. We recommend running both in the pre-scan stage to map the whole problem at once.

These answers share the same data source as the FAQ page.

Have a testing requirement? Send us your product details

Tell us the product model and test requirements. Our engineers will map out the test plan, the applicable standards and the item combination, and provide a quotation reference. The more specific the request, the sharper the answer.

  • Free scoping of the test plan and standards
  • Pre-scan testing during R&D to cut rework cost
  • On-site visits and witnessed testing supported
  • Scheduling per project, with progress updates at each milestone

Received — we will contact you shortly and follow up with a test plan and quotation.

By submitting you agree to be contacted by phone or email. Scheduling follows the project’s actual availability and is subject to mutual confirmation.

13510907826